06.11.2024 Arbitrariness of judges Business of Occupiers Declaration Kyiv

How judges of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv serve traitors and Russian business

Печерський суд Києва відмовився відсторонити від посад підозрюваних у хабарництві хорольських прокурорів / Полтавщина

Judge Svitlana Smyk of the Pechersk District Court of Kyiv has been systematically serving Russian interests. A few days before she lifted the seizure of the Russian Pin-UP’s money and ordered the casino to return 2.6 billion hryvnias to Ukraine, Smyk lifted the seizure of the assets of Vadym Rabinovych, a traitor to Ukraine and Medvedchuk’s associate.

This decision was not publicized, so all of the traitor’s property has been re-registered several times.

Just as the state has probably already managed to pay the Russian Pin-Up 20% per annum from the purchase of military bonds by the ARMA with the seized funds.

Thus, Russian business will receive a yield of 520 million per year in Ukraine. This money should be taken away from the Armed Forces and returned to the enemy’s pockets for missiles and drones.

In addition, the judges of the Pechersk District Court are guarding another gambling business with Russian roots, Favbet. According to media reports, the owner of the latter, Andriy Matyukha, has a Russian passport. He has been inspected by law enforcement agencies, subjected to searches, and accused of sponsoring terrorist organizations of the LPR and DPR. Nevertheless, the man remains out of the spotlight of law enforcement because he allegedly helps the Ukrainian Armed Forces by donating and supplying necessary goods.

By the decision of investigating judge Hryhorenko I.V. in case No. 757/35762/24-k, the complaint of the NGO “Non-Stop” against the inaction of prosecutors of the Prosecutor General’s Office was dismissed. The same judge, but in a different case No. 757/35767/24-k, refused to oblige the Kyiv City Bureau of Investigation to enter information into the URPTI. So who are the guarantors of justice really protecting and whose interests are they serving?

Judge Smyk makes decisions in favor of pro-Russian figures and is also in the news because of her unexplained wealth, which formally belongs to her family but is connected to her. Does society deserve honest answers?

A look at the wealth of a “modest” judge

ВРП покарала суддю, яка затягувала розгляд і закривала справи водіїв напідпитку ➜ ZMINA

Smyk herself, according to her declaration, owns only two apartments (one of which is a service apartment and the other inherited), some cash (70 thousand dollars and 205 thousand hryvnias) and small amounts in bank accounts. She doesn’t own a car, but she regularly drives a Mercedes-Benz GLE 400 registered to her son’s common-law wife, Anna Drych. Where does such generosity come from?

The judge’s son, Oleh Movchun, and his partner own a network of sports clubs called Workshop (The network consists of four clubs and three legal entities: Workshop Sofia LLC, Workshop Fitness LLC, and Workshop Boulevard LLC) and own a 2023 Lexus LX 500D, a Toyota Land Cruiser Prado, and luxury real estate in and around Kyiv. Drych also owns several apartments and commercial real estate, and uses a Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG.

Interestingly, the judge’s son has had a deferral from mobilization since July 2024, and has already left Ukraine several times, just like Judge Smyk herself, who has made 10 trips abroad since the beginning of the war.

Can we turn a blind eye to the way some members of the judiciary accumulate wealth and avoid responsibility? Or is it time for change, where transparency and justice are not just words?

Did you witness a crime?

Let us know about it. We will help protect the violated rights!

Share the post:

Last news

ALL NEWS ALL ARTICLES